|本期目录/Table of Contents|

试析元代哲学史研究向度(PDF)

《内蒙古大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1000-9035/CN:22-1262/O4]

期数:
2019年06期
页码:
76-80
栏目:
哲学研究
出版日期:
2019-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of Research Dimensions of the
History of Philosophy in the Yuan Dynasty
作者:
郭晓丽
内蒙古大学哲学学院,内蒙古  呼和浩特  010021
Author(s):
GUO Xiao-li
School of Philosophy, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021,China
关键词:
元代哲学向度实践道学
Keywords:
Philosophy of the Yuan Dynasty dimensions practice Taoism
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
中国哲学史研究既有理论的向度,又有实践的向度。作为宋元明中国历史变迁的重要一环,元代以哲学实践见长,讲求经世致用,正是元代高度确立了道学的官学地位,为新的时代条件下的国家认同和文化共识奠定了基础。中国哲学史叙述,必须关注元代哲学的这一实践特色,研究和阐发其实践活动的哲学意蕴。
Abstract:
Philosophy itself is both theory and practice. As an important part of the historical changes in China’s early modernization in Song, Yuan and Ming Dynasties, the Yuan Dynasty was known for its philosophical practices and the pursuit for pragmatism. It is the highly established official status of Neo-Confucianism in the Yuan Dynasty that has laid the foundation for the national identity and cultural consensus in the new era. This paper holds that the illustration of the history of Chinese philosophy should pay attention to the practical character of the philosophy in the Yuan Dynasty, studying and elucidating the philosophical implication of its practical activities.

参考文献/References

[1]北京大学哲学系中国哲学教研室.中国哲学史[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003.
[2]侯外庐,邱汉生,张岂之.宋明理学史(上卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1984.
[3]郭齐勇.中国哲学史[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.
[4]宋濂.元史[M].北京:中华书局,1976.
[5]陈来,杨立华,杨柱才,等.中国儒学史·宋元卷[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2011.
[6](元)脱脱,等.宋史[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[7]葛兆光.主持人的话[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2017(1).
[8]钟泰.中国哲学史(下)[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1998.
[9]萧启庆.内北国而外中国:蒙元史研究(上)[M].北京:中华书局,2007.
[10]〔美〕杜维明.体知儒学[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2012.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-07-12
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目(项目批准号:13YJA720005)
作者简介:郭晓丽,女,山西大同市人,内蒙古大学哲学学院,教授。 
更新日期/Last Update: