|本期目录/Table of Contents|

金志高 “中世纪的希罗多德”:劳尼库斯《精粹历史》的特点及影响(PDF)

《内蒙古大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1000-9035/CN:22-1262/O4]

期数:
2019年02期
页码:
71-77
栏目:
历史学研究
出版日期:
2019-03-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Herodotus in the Middle Ages: on the Traits and Influence of  Laonikos Chalkokondyles’ Apodeixeis Historiōn
作者:
金志高
南开大学历史学院,天津  300350
Author(s):
JIN  Zhi-gao
School of History, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China
关键词:
拜占庭劳尼库斯《精粹历史》
Keywords:
Byzantium Laonikos Apodeixeis Historiōn
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
拜占庭末代史家劳尼库斯的《精粹历史》是研究拜占庭晚期和奥斯曼土耳其早期历史的不可或缺的重要文献。与传统拜占庭史家的著作相比,《精粹历史》具有非常明显的特点,表现为写作内容和风格上的强烈仿古典史学倾向,对其他民族和宗教的客观叙述态度,以及在解释事件因果关系时使用“命运”史观。这些特点的形成与劳尼库斯的个人经历、导师的影响及当时的时代背景密切相关。《精粹历史》不但具有重要的史料价值,其对古典史学的复兴和独特史学观念,以及文艺复兴及近代希腊民族意识的觉醒产生了重要影响。
Abstract:
Apodeixeis Historiōn by the late Byzantine historian Laonikos Chalkokondyles is an indispensable document for the study of late Byzantine and early Ottoman history. Compared with the works of traditional Byzantine historians, Apodeixeis Historiōn  has some distinctive traits, such as the close imitation of classical historiography in content and style, the objective attitudes in the narration of  other peoples and religions, and the use of the "destiny" perspective of history to explain the cause-effect relations among history events. The formation of these traits are closely related to his personal experience, the influence of his mentor and the social environment at that time. Not only is   Apodeixeis Historiōn  is an important source of historical data but also it has important influence on the revival of classical historiography, and its unique historical perspective also had an important influence on the Renaissance and the awakening of modern Greek national consciousness.

参考文献/References

[1]George Ostrogorsky. History of the Byzantine State[M]. New Jersey:Rutgers University Press,1957.
[2]W. Miller. The Last Athenian Historian: Laonikos Chalkokondyles[J]. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1992(42).
[3]A.Markopoulos. Das Bild des Anderen bei Laonikos Chakokondyles und das Vorild Herodot[J]. Jahrbuch der  erreichischen Byzantini stik,2002(50).
[4]Anthony Kaladllis.A New Herodotos: Laonikos Chalkokondyles on the Ottoman Empire, the Fall of Byzantium, and the Emergence of the West[M] .Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014.
 [5]Laonikos Chalkokondyles. The Histories(Vol. II)[M].trans.Anthony Kaladllis.  Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014.
 [6] Laonikos Chalkokondyles. The Histories(Vol. I)[M].trans.Anthony Kaladllis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014.
[7]Jonathan Harris. Laonikos Chalkokondyles and the rise of the Ottoman Turks[J]. Byzantine & Modern Greek Studies, 2003(27).
[8]Mathieu de Bakker. Explaining the End of an Empire: The Use of Ancient Greek Religious Views in Late Byzantine Historiography[J]. Histos,2015,Supplement (4).
[9]Nikolaos Nikoloudis. Laonikos Chalkokondyles on the Council of Florence[J]. Ekklesiastikos Pharos,1992(3).
[10]Teresa Shawcross.The Chronicle of Morea:Historiography of Crusader Greece[M]. Oxford and New York:Oxford University Press, 2009.
 [11]Aslihan Akisik. Self and Other in the Renaissance: Laonikos Chalkokondyles and Late Byzantine Intellectuals[D]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2013.
[12]J. M. Alonso- Nuez. Herodotus’ Conception of Historical Space and the Beginnings of Universal History[A].Peter Derow,Robert Parker.Herodotus and His World: Essays from a Conference in Memory of George Forrest[C]. Oxford :Oxford University Press, 2003.
[13]Cyriacus of Ancona.Later Travels[M]. ed. and  trans. Edward W. Bodnar,Clive Foss. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003.
[14]陈志强. 拜占廷文明对古代文明的继承[N].光明日报, 2015-08-01.
[15]M.Grant .The Ancient Historians[M].New York: Duck-worth,1970.
[16]〔英〕N.H.拜尼斯.拜占庭:东罗马文明概论 [M].陈志强,郑玮,等译.郑州:大象出版社,2012.
[17]〔英〕斯蒂文·任西曼.1453—君士坦丁堡的陷落[M].马千译.北京:北京时代华文书局, 2014.
 [18]James Hankins.Plato in the Italian Renaissance[M].Leiden:E.J. Brill,1990.
[19]C.M.Woodhouse.Gemstos Plethon:The Last of the Hellenes[M]. Oxford:Clarendon Press,1986.
[20]R. Webb. The Nomoi of Gemistos Plethon in the Light of Plato’s Laws[J]. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes,1989(52).
[21]Marie-Hélène Blanchet.Georges-Gennadios Scholarios (vers 1400-vers 1472):un Intellectuel  Orthodoxe Faceàla Disparition de l’empire Byzantin
[M].Paris: Fran ais d’tudes Byzantines, 2008.
[22]Michael Kritoboulos.History of Mehmed the Conqueror[M].trans.Charles
T.Riggs.New Jersey: Princeton University Press,1954.
[23]James Hankins.The "Baron Thesis" after Forty Years and Some Recent Studies of Leonardo Bruni[J]. Journal of the History of Ideas,1995(56).

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-11-01
基金项目:国家社科重大项目(项目批准号:14ZDB061)
作者简介:金志高,男,河北沧州市人,南开大学历史学院,博士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: