|本期目录/Table of Contents|

程序正义理念的实证研究——对呼格吉勒图再审案和聂树斌再审案的比较分析(PDF)

《内蒙古大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1000-9035/CN:22-1262/O4]

期数:
2017年04期
页码:
73-83
栏目:
法学研究
出版日期:
2017-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Empirical Research on the Theory of Procedural Justice——A Comparison between the Hugejiletu Case and the Nie Shubin Case
作者:
周宝峰
内蒙古大学法学院,内蒙古  呼和浩特  010021
Author(s):
ZHOU Bao-feng
 School of Law, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China
关键词:
程序正义司法改革审判监督程序再审
Keywords:
 Procedural justice judicial reform trial supervision procedure retrial
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
呼格吉勒图再审案和聂树斌再审案是两个相似并具有重大影响的大案。这两起冤案均发生于法治不彰的“严打”期间,并且均为“真凶出现”进而获得昭雪的结果。综观这两起再审案的实际运行及其运行结果,二者既有高度相似的背景因素和实体结果,也有不同的程序运行轨迹,更有因时间因素而导致的程序正义理念落实程度的差异。两起再审案的启动在本质上均属于非程序性的再审启动。两起再审案的实践再一次证明,我国审判监督程序的启动程序必须经受符合程序正义理念的改造。与呼格吉勒图再审案的存疑无罪判决相比,聂树斌再审案的存疑无罪判决更加符合程序正义的应有之义。没有贯彻回避和变更管辖这两种程序制度所体现的程序正义理念,是呼格吉勒图再审案的硬伤。聂树斌再审案的异地复查和最高人民法院提审则体现了裁判中立的程序正义立场,是程序正义理念的重大进步。
Abstract:
 Both the Hugejiletu retrial case and the Nie Shubin retrial case are interrelated and have significant influence on Chinese society. Their unjust verdicts were given during the arbitrary "Cracking down on criminal offenses" period in China. Their grievances were redressed later after the real criminals were found. Their backgrounds and retrial verdicts were highly similar, but their retrial procedures were different. There were differences in sticking to the procedural justice theory due to the time factor. Both the two retrial cases were not started according to the procedural justice theory. It is necessary to reform the procedure of criminal trial supervision in accordance with the procedural justice theory in China. Compared with the acquittal of Hugejiletu retrial case, the open verdict of Nie Shubin retrial case was coincident with the procedural justice. The Hugejiletu retrial procedure disobeyed the challenge system and alteration of jurisdiction system. The alteration of jurisdiction of Nie Shubin retrial case conformed with the procedural justice and was making significant advances in Chinese criminal procedure.

参考文献/References

[1]内蒙古呼格吉勒图再审案[N].人民法院报,2015-01-06.
[2]莫洪宪.聂树斌改判无罪的法治意义[N].人民法院报,2016-12-02.
[3]人大内司委:纠正呼格案等冤假错案体现中国司法进步[EB/OL].中国新闻网, http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2015/03-10/7117112.shtml,2015-03-10.
[4]陈瑞华.刑事审判原理论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1997.
[5]记者5篇内参助呼格吉勒图翻案[N].京华时报,2014-12-16.
[6]王筱渔.呼格吉勒图案始末:被枪毙9年后另一男子供述杀人经过[EB/OL].凤凰网, http://news.ifeng.com/a/20141112/42452914_0.shtml,2014-11-12.
[7]呼格吉勒图案:枪决18年后的再审[EB/OL].财新网, http://china.caixin.com/2014-11-20/100753675.html,2014-11-20.
[8]内蒙古呼格案再审过程披露:疑似真凶曾要求偿命[EB/OL].凤凰网资讯,http://news.ifeng.com/a/20141128/42596149_2.shtml,2014-11-28.
[9]呼格案内参记者汤计:有一种动力让我坚持到底[EB/OL].新京报,http://epaper.bjnews.com.cn/html/2014-11/30/content_549747.htm?div=-1,2014-11-30.
[10]闵钐.检察官客观义务[J].国家检察官学院学报,2005,(4).
[11]季卫东.法治秩序的构建[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999.
[12]周宝峰.刑事被告人权利宪法化研究[M].呼和浩特:内蒙古大学出版社,2007.
[13]沈德咏.我们应当如何防范冤假错案[N].人民法院报,2013-05-06.
[14]周宝峰.证据法之基本问题[M].呼和浩特:内蒙古大学出版社,2015.
[15]〔日〕谷口安平.程序的正义与诉讼[M].王亚新,刘荣军译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
[16][美]迈克尔·D·贝勒斯.程序正义——向个人的分配[M].邓海平译.北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
[17]张维.疑似真凶王书金:活在“聂树斌案”里的11年[N].新京报,2016-06-13.
[18]赵蕾,邓江波.聂树斌案:最高法再审审查正在进行[N].南方周末,2012-09-15.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-04-21
作者简介: 周宝峰,男,蒙古族,辽宁昌图县人,内蒙古大学法学院,教授。
更新日期/Last Update: