|本期目录/Table of Contents|

清雍乾之际驻京提塘泄密问题研究(PDF)

《内蒙古大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1000-9035/CN:22-1262/O4]

期数:
2016年06期
页码:
48-53
栏目:
历史学研究
出版日期:
2016-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 A Study of Divulgation Among Beijing Liaison Officers inYongzheng-Qianlong Period of the Qing Dynasty
作者:
马维熙
中国人民大学清史研究所,北京 100872
Author(s):
 MA Wei-xi
 The Institute of Qing History, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
关键词:
雍乾之际驻京提塘泄密问题
Keywords:
 Yongzheng-Qianlong period the Beijing liaison officers issue of divulgation
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
清代驻京提塘,是在中央部院与地方督抚之间递送政务文报的驻京官员。其选用操于督抚,而管理归于兵部。这就使驻京提塘具备了双重身份,得以游走于朝廷与省衙之间。然而,受入仕机会的限制,驻京提塘在中央与地方的政治博弈中或主动或被动地靠近后者,渐趋沦为替督抚打探京中情报的工具。由此产生的政务信息泄密问题,自是屡禁不止,在消解清代保密制度的同时,亦成为清代政治机体中难以祛除的痼疾。
Abstract:
 The Beijing liaison officers in the Qing Dynasty were the officers whose responsibility was to deliver reports of government affairs between the royal court and the provincial governors. Those liaison officers were chosen by civil and military governors and administrated by the Ministry of War, hereby endowing them with double identities and enabling them to go between the royal court and provincial governments. However, limited by the opportunities of entering the official career, the liaison officers tended to passively or actively side with provincial governors during the political game between the central government and the local ones, becoming a tool to detect confidentiality for the latter. The resulting problem of divulgation of political confidentiality continued despite the repeated prohibitions and became, when the confidentiality system was eradicated, a chronic illness difficult to eradicate in the political system of the Qing Dynasty not mention to eradicate it from the political system, therefore unavoidably undermined the confidentiality system of the Qing Dynasty.

参考文献/References

 [1]刘文鹏.清代提塘考[J].清史研究,2007,(4).
[2]刘文鹏.清代驿传及其与疆域形成关系之研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
[3]李章程.清代提塘与公文传递[J].档案学通讯,2015,(3).
[4]周易译注[M].黄寿祺,张善文译注.上海:上海古籍出版社,1991.
[5]赵尔巽,等.清史稿[M].北京:中华书局,1976.
[6]〔清〕李虹若.朝市丛载[M].清光绪十二年京都松竹斋刻本.北京:北京出版社,2015.
[7]钦定大清会典则例(乾隆朝)[M]//景印文渊阁四库全书:第623册.台北:台湾商务印书馆,2008.
[8](道光)济南府志[M].〔清〕王赠芳,等修.成瓘,等纂.清道光二十年刻本.北京:中华书局,2013.
[9]钦定大清会典则例(乾隆朝)[M]//景印文渊阁四库全书:第624册.台北:台湾商务印书馆,2008.
[10]清高宗实录[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[11]钦定大清会典则例(乾隆朝)[M]//景印文渊阁四库全书:第622册.台北:台湾商务印书馆,2008.
[12]大清律例[M].田涛,郑秦点校.北京:法律出版社,1999.
[13]钦定八旗通志(乾隆朝)[M]//景印文渊阁四库全书:第667册.台北:台湾商务印书馆,2008.
[14]清世宗实录[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[15]刘文鹏.盛世背后:乾隆时代的伪稿案研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2014.
[16]清圣祖实录[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[17]钦定八旗通志(乾隆朝)[M]//景印文渊阁四库全书:第666册.台北:台湾商务印书馆,2008.
[18]中国第一历史档案馆.嘉庆道光两朝上谕档:第24册[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2000.
[19]清文宗实录[M].北京:中华书局,1986.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 收稿日期: 2016-10-11
作者简介: 马维熙,男,陕西汉中市人,中国人民大学清史研究所,博士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: