|本期目录/Table of Contents|

古代“和而不同”思想的内涵演变及其社会价值(PDF)

《内蒙古大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1000-9035/CN:22-1262/O4]

期数:
2016年02期
页码:
81-86
栏目:
历史学研究
出版日期:
2016-04-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Research on the Changes and Social Values of the Ancient Chinese Thoughts "Harmonious But Not The Same"
作者:
邓国军蓝海
南开大学历史学院,天津 300350
Author(s):
 DENG Guo-junLAN Hai
 College of History, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China
关键词:
“和”“同”君子“和而不同”
Keywords:
 Harmonious the same gentleman harmonious but not the same
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
孔子以降,讫于近代,本来是“和而不同”思想发展的重要时期,然而关于这一时期“和而不同”思想的具体内涵、演变轨迹等问题,却乏人问津。其实这一时期“和而不同”思想内涵甚为丰富,概言之:一是君子之道,即“和而不同”用于形容君子的德行;二是事君之道,即“和而不同”用于形容礼乐等级制下的君臣关系;三是相处之道,即“和而不同”用于形容士人之间和谐相处的状态。魏晋及以后,随着君子人格的分化、名士人格的兴起,曾为君子德行的“和而不同”,逐渐演变为名士的品德,在政治领域里表现为“事君之道”,在社会领域里表现为“相处之道”。其中事君、相处之道应用于政治和文化领域,推动了中国古代谏官制度的发展和学术、艺术文化的进步。
Abstract:
 From the age of the Confucius to the modern era, the thought of "harmonious but not the same" should have been greatly developed. But there are few people who cared about its specific ideas and changes. Actually, its ideological connotations are very plentiful. First, it is the principle of being a gentleman, which was used to describe the noble virtues of the gentleman. Second, the principle of working for the monarch used to describe the relationship between the monarch and chancellors under the ritual hierarchy. Third, the principle of getting along with others, which was used to describe the state of harmony among Confucianists. With the development of the thought of "harmonious but not the same", the principle of being a gentleman has evolved into the principle of working for the monarch and that of getting along with others. The last two principles are widely used in the political and cultural fields, which have shed important implications to the development of the remonstrant system and to the progress of the ancient Chinese academics, art, and culture.

参考文献/References

[1]裘锡圭.甲骨文中的几种乐器名称——释“庸”“丰”“鼗”[A].古文字论集[C].北京:中华书局,1992.[2]马承源.商周青铜器铭文选[M].北京:文物出版社,1990.
[3]朱彦民.“和”“合”溯源——从甲骨文看中华和合文化的早期源流[A].第七届寒山寺文化论坛论文集[C].上海:上海三联书店,2014.
[4]杨伯峻.论语译注[M].北京:中华书局,2006.
[5]〔明〕朱载堉.乐律全书:18卷[M]//文渊阁四库全书.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983.
[6]马鹏翔.君子与名士——汉晋士人理想人格转型之研究[D].南开大学博士学位论文,2014.
[7]〔南朝〕范晔.后汉书:80卷(下)[M].北京:中华书局,1965.
[8]〔北宋〕林之奇.尚书全解:26卷[M]//文渊阁四库全书.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983.
[9]〔南宋〕易祓.周易总义:11卷[M]//文渊阁四库全书.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983.
[10]〔唐〕魏徵,等.隋书:61卷[M]//文渊阁四库全书.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983.
[11]〔唐〕马总.意林:5卷[M]//文渊阁四库全书.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983.
[12]〔元〕脱脱,等.宋史:卷四三四[O]//文渊阁四库全书.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983.
[13]〔清〕徐乾学.资治通鉴后编:卷一二五[O]//文渊阁四库全书.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983.
[14]〔清〕袁枚.随园诗话:卷八[M].顾颉刚点校.北京:人民文学出版社,1982.
[15]〔清〕阮元龙.历代赋汇[M] .南京:江苏古籍出版社,1987.
[16]〔后晋〕刘昫,等.旧唐书:100卷[M]//文渊阁四库全书.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983.
[17]〔清〕茅坤.唐宋八大家文抄:157卷[M]//文渊阁四库全书.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983.
[18]〔明〕何乔远.名山藏[M].张德信,等点校.福州:福建人民出版社,2005.
[19]刘泽华.洗耳斋文集[M].天津:南开大学出版社,2003.
[20]方克立.“和而不同”:作为一种文化观的意义和价值[J].中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2003,(1).
[21]顾炎武.日知录:27卷[M]//文渊阁四库全书.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983.
[22]〔清〕陈康祺.郎潜纪闻初笔二笔三笔[M].北京:中华书局,1997.
[23]〔清〕卞永誉.式古堂书画考:7卷[M]//文渊阁四库全书.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:  2015-12-20
作者简介:  邓国军,男,山西忻州市人,南开大学历史学院,博士研究生;蓝海,男,瑶族,广西都安县人,南开大学历史学院,副教授。
更新日期/Last Update: