|本期目录/Table of Contents|

“明确的被告”与被告主体审查制度构建(PDF)

《内蒙古大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1000-9035/CN:22-1262/O4]

期数:
2016年01期
页码:
99-104
栏目:
法学研究
出版日期:
2016-01-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Review of the Concepts of "the Clear Defendant" and the Construction of Related Systems
作者:
颜君
中国人民大学法学院,北京  100872
Author(s):
 YAN Jun
 School of Law,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China
关键词:
明确的被告立案登记制被告主体审查
Keywords:
 The clear defendant filling of the complaint mechanism review of defendants’ capacity
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
新民事诉讼法解释中将“明确的被告”解释为“可识别的被告”,在此规定下,是否能切实解决在起诉阶段保障当事人诉权的问题,以及在送达阶段、审理阶段被告主体的程序审查标准和提供被告信息责任分担缺乏相应规定的问题,使得司法传统中依附于“明确的被告”条款的被告主体程序审查体系的结构性调整势在必行。从程序的功能目的和程序利益平衡理论出发,“明确的被告”概念界定问题可以被解析为起诉阶段、送达阶段、审理阶段三个层面被告主体程序审查的问题,这使得以前错综复杂的“明确的被告”之适用问题得以清晰呈现并逐步得出相关程序重构之方案——提出当事人信息提供责任之分担及归责原则问题,并对起诉与审理阶段被告主体程序审查标准予以分段式构建。
Abstract:
 The new civil procedure law explains the "clear defendant" as "the identifiable defendant", if this explanation can effectively solve the problem of protecting the rights of the parties in the prosecution stage, and in the service stage and trial stage, the standards of the review of the defendant’s capacity and the responsibility to share defendant’s information is lack of relevant provisions, so that the judicial tradition of reviewing the defendant’s capacity by the "clear defendant" prevision is to be adjusted. Under the principle of procedure function purpose and the balance of interests, and with "clear the defendant" definition being deconstructed for the appealing stage, the serving stage, the trial stage three levels, for the first time thus the perplexing the application of "the clear defendant " issue be clearly presented and gradually obtained the proper solution—revealing the sharing of the party’s responsibility to provide the party information; and the standard of reviewing the defendant’s capacity is to be segmented according to different stages of the procedure.

参考文献/References

[1]〔英〕J.A.乔罗威茨.民事诉讼程序研究[M].吴泽勇译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2008.
[2]沈达明,冀宗儒.1999年英国民事诉讼规则诠释[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2005.
[3]毕玉谦.民事诉讼起诉要件与诉讼系属之间关系的定位[J].华东政法学院学报,2006,(4).

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2015-10-01
作者简介: 颜君,女,四川泸州市人,中国人民大学法学院,博士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: