|本期目录/Table of Contents|

论司法公开的本质回归与供需平衡(PDF)

《内蒙古大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1000-9035/CN:22-1262/O4]

期数:
2015年02期
页码:
106-112
栏目:
法学研究
出版日期:
2015-04-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Essence Regression and Equilibrium of Supply and Demand of Judicial Openness
作者:
杨炎辉
中国人民大学法学院, 北京 100872
Author(s):
YANG Yan-hui
School of Law, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
关键词:
司法公开内生型外发型本质回归供需平衡
Keywords:
Judicial opennessendogenous modelexogenous modelessence regressionequilibrium of supply and demand
分类号:
D926.2
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
-
摘要:
司法公开根据动力来源的区别可以分为内生型和外发型两种模式。尽管当前全国法院正在全面推进司法公开,但主要是作为回应社会需求的工具性政策考量,而忽视了其本位价值,导致其目标取向、制度构建、工作推进等方面出现偏离。为此,一方面要厘清司法公开与司法公正的定位,促进司法公开的本质回归;另一方面,在制定落实司法公开政策时,要注重兼顾理性建构与经验推动,努力实现供需平衡。
Abstract:
According to the power source, judicial openness can be divided into two types, the endogenous model and the exogenous model. In China, the people’s courts at all level are promoting the judicial openness, but they mainly function as a response to the social demand, and ignore the standard value. Thus, the goal, mechanism and implementation of judicial openness seem to be off the beam. Therefore, on the one hand, it is necessary to clarify the position of the judicial openness and the justice, so as to promote the essence regression of judicial openness. On the other hand, when making and implementing the policy of judicial openness, we should pay attention to both the rational construction and the practical experience in order to balance the supply and demand.

参考文献/References

[1] 〔德〕黑格尔.法哲学原理[M].范扬,张企泰译.北京:商务印书馆,1961.
[2] 韩大元.论审判独立原则的宪法功能[J].苏州大学学报(法学版),2014,(1).
[3] 龙宗智."内忧外患"中的审判公开——主要从刑事诉讼的视角分析[J].当代法学,2013,(6).
[4] 蒋惠岭.论司法公开的监督力量转化[J].人民司法(应用),2014,(9).
[5] 苏力.谨慎,但不是拒绝——对判决书全部上网的一个显然保守的分析[J].法律适用,2010,(1).
[6] 江必新,程琥.司法程序公开研究[J].法律适用,2014,(1).

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2014-10-29;改回日期:。
作者简介:杨炎辉,男,湖南醴陵市人,中国人民大学法学院,博士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01