|本期目录/Table of Contents|

多元共同体视域下自由与民主的结合——论墨菲的民主观(PDF)

《内蒙古大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1000-9035/CN:22-1262/O4]

期数:
2015年02期
页码:
58-63
栏目:
哲学研究
出版日期:
2015-04-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
A combination Between Liberalism and Democracy in the Multivariate Communities Perspective——Comment on Mouffe’s Theory of Democracy
作者:
骆夷
南开大学哲学院, 天津 300071
Author(s):
LUO Yi
School of Philosophy, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
关键词:
自由主义民主多元主义激进的多元民主
Keywords:
Liberalismdemocracypluralismradical-multivariate democracy
分类号:
D082
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
-
摘要:
墨菲试图调和自由主义与民主,构建一种激进的多元民主政治理论。在宏观层面,这一理论体现为多元的社会共同体争夺话语霸权的过程;在微观层面,作为社会主体的多元共同体具有很多偶然性和不确定性,同时,墨菲既区分了个体身份与公民身份、私人领域与公共领域,又将这些分离链接起来,这一逻辑与她将自由主义和民主结合起来的逻辑相似。民主倾向于一种等值性逻辑,自由主义倾向于一种差异性逻辑,而墨菲认为,现代民主无法完全抛弃自由主义,自由与平等之间的张力恰恰构成了一种新的民主政治方式。墨菲的这一独特理论构建在具有积极意义的同时,也因
Abstract:
Chantal Mouffe tries to construct a radical multivariate democratic political theory by combining liberalism and democracy. At the macro level, her theory presents as a process in which the multivariate communities scrambles for hegemony; at the micro level, multivariate communities have many chances and uncertainties, and at the same time, Mouffe not only distinguishes between the individual identity and citizenship, the private and public sectors, but also links up these separate parts. It has the same logic with which she combines liberalism and democracy. Democracy tends to an equivalent logic, and liberalism tends to an otherness logic, but Mouffe claims that a contemporary democracy should not reject liberalism completely. The different logics between them will just form a tension for deepening democracy. From the perspective of post-Marxism, Mouffe’ theory has many unique values and senses. Meanwhile, her theory is full of uncertainties for it could not solve the problems in realistic society.

参考文献/References

[1] 陈炳辉.西方马克思主义的国家理论[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2004.
[2] 〔英〕尚塔尔·墨菲.政治的回归[M].王恒,臧佩洪译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2005.
[3] 陈炳辉.墨菲的后马克思主义理论[J].马克思主义与现实(双月刊),2003,(2).
[4] Chantal Mouffe.Democratic Politics and the Question of Identity[M]. London:Routledge,1992.
[5] 付文忠,孔明安."后马克思主义"理论的批判解读——拉克劳与墨菲的"后马克思主义"评析[J].马克思主义研究,2004,(2).
[6] 周凡.回答一个问题:何谓后马克思主义[J].江苏社会科学,2005,(1).
[7] 〔斯洛文尼亚〕斯拉沃热·齐泽克.意识形态的崇高客体[M].季广茂译.北京:中央编译出版社,2002.
[8] 靳辉明.坚定哲学党性原则 执著追求科学真理——纪念孙伯钅癸同志逝世一周年[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学版),2004,(3).
[9] 马克思.关于费尔巴哈的提纲[A].马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2014-9-23;改回日期:。
作者简介:骆夷,女,辽宁绥中县人,南开大学哲学院,博士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01