|本期目录/Table of Contents|

调解替代判决结案现象探析(PDF)

《内蒙古大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1000-9035/CN:22-1262/O4]

期数:
2013年03期
页码:
58-63
栏目:
法学研究
出版日期:
1900-01-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
An Exploration into the Phenomenon of Lawsuit Settlement by Court Decision Substituted by Conciliation
作者:
程延军1 王书义2
1. 内蒙古大学法学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010021;
2. 呼和浩特市铁路党校, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010051
Author(s):
CHENG Yan-jun1 WANG Shu-yi2
1. Law School of Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China;
2. Hohhot Railway Bureau Party School, Hohhot 010051, China
关键词:
调解判决发生学负面影响
Keywords:
conciliationcourt decisionembryologynegative impact
分类号:
D923
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
-
摘要:
作为纠纷解决方式之一, 调解是我国固有传统文化的重要内容。目前, 调解替代判决结案现象是我国强调"重调解"和"调解优先"的司法政策所引发的新问题。调解制度虽然有其深刻的历史传统和一定的现实基础, 但在司法实践中以调代判的不科学性和负面影响逐渐凸显。依据数理统计从发生学、法史学进行多角度观察和分析调解替代判决现象的成因及消极影响, 提出克服此现象的逻辑路径。必须设计合理的调解程序规范, 实现判决的自恰性及制定科学的司法政策, 严格遵循调解的自愿原则并建立有效的监督制约机制等具体解决路径。
Abstract:
As one of the dispute resolutions, conciliation is a very important content in the inherent traditional culture of China. Nowadays, the phenomenon that conciliation replaces court decision is a new issue caused by judicial policies which emphasize "value conciliation" and "conciliation first’ in China. It has a profound historical tradition and realistic foundation. However, its unscientific aspects and negative impact are emerging gradually in practice. Starting from mathematical statistics and analyzing deeply the causes and negative influences from the points of view such as statistics, embryology and legal history, this research proposes a logical path to overcome this phenomenon. It also shows clearly it is supposed to design reasonable conciliation program to achieve self-consistency of court decisions, to formulate the scientific judicial policies, to strictly follow the principle of voluntaries of conciliation, and to establish an effective mechanism of supervision and some other specific solution paths.

参考文献/References

[1] 江伟, 杨荣. 人民调解学概论[M]. 北京:法律出版社, 1994.
[2] 李祖军. 调解制度论:冲突解决的和谐之路[M]. 北京:法律出版社, 2010.
[3] 王雷. 洲湖法庭创新调解, 当事人到庭案件调撤率100%[EB/OL]. 安福县人民法院网, http://afxfy.chinacourt.org/public/detail.php?id=4019, 2009-03-30.
[4] 樊正威, 郑春笋. 临邑法院民事赔偿调解率连续五年保持100%[EB/OL]. 人民网, http://sd.people.com.cn/GB/215391/215901/15089135.html, 2011-07-06.
[5] 韩学纠. 关于基层人民法庭调解工作的调研报告[EB/OL]. 商洛市商州区法院网, http://szqfy.chinacourt.org/public/detail.php?id=274,2012-08-30.
[6] 王胜俊. 最高人民法院工作报告[EB/OL]. 新华网, http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2012lh/2012-03/19/,2012-03-19.
[7] 何兵. 现代社会的纠纷解决[M]. 北京:法律出版社, 2003.
[8] 吴晖. 民事诉讼调解与判决之效率量化比较[M]. 中国法院网, http://old.chinacourt.org/html/article/200404/05/110070.shtml,2004-04-05.
[9] 周永坤. 论强制性调解对法治和公平的冲击[J]. 法律科学, 2007, (3).
[10] 张晋藩. 中国司法制度史[M]. 北京:人民法院出版社, 2004.
[11] 马小红. 中国法制史[M]. 北京:北京师范大学出版社, 2009.
[12] 王立民. 中国法制史[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社, 2003.
[13] 李永泉. 重构我国法院调解制度的理性思考—以法院调解的价值目标为导向[J]. 理论与改革, 2006, (6).
[14] 钱弘道. 经济分析法学[M]. 北京:法律出版社, 2003.
[15] [德]哈贝马斯. 在事实与规范之间[M]. 童世骏译. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2003.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2012-9-27;改回日期:。
作者简介:程延军,男,内蒙古赤峰市人,内蒙古大学法学院,副教授;王书义,男,河北临城县人,呼和浩特市铁路党校,助教。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01