|本期目录/Table of Contents|

论科恩对罗尔斯差别原则的一种批判(PDF)

《内蒙古大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1000-9035/CN:22-1262/O4]

期数:
2011年04期
页码:
72-77
栏目:
哲学研究
出版日期:
2011-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Discuss Cohen’s Criticism to Rawlsian Difference Principle
作者:
张全胜
西安财经学院思政部, 陕西西安 710100
Author(s):
ZHANG Quan-sheng
Department of Ideological and Political, Xi’an University of Finance and Economics, Xi’an 710100, China
关键词:
科恩罗尔斯道德任意性差别原则关系平等
Keywords:
CohenRawlsionthe moral arbitrarinessDifference Principlerelational egalitarianism
分类号:
B152
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
-
摘要:
科恩教授在《拯救正义与平等》一书中,向我们展示了一种他对罗尔斯差别原则的批判:为差别原则辩护的道德任意性声明与差别原则本身的内容相矛盾。道德任意性声明谴责那种由自然的天赋和社会环境的偶然性引起的不平等,包含对关系平等的肯定;而差别原则,特别是规范地、词典式序列解读的差别原则本身的内容,则无视人与人之间关系的比较。
Abstract:
In his Rscuing Justice and Eduality,G·A·Cohen demonstrates a charge to Rawlsion Difference Principle: The moral arbitrariness claims case for the Difference Principle contradicts its content.Cohen argues that the moral arbitrariness claims condemns the inequality caused by the arbitrariness of natural contingency and social fortune and includes an affirmation of relational egalitarianism;however,the content of Difference Principle,especially,the canonical and lexical Difference Principle makes that principle blind to comparisons between people,in the relevant sense.

参考文献/References

[1] 段忠桥.拯救平,等.科恩对罗尔斯差别原则的两个批判[J].中国人民大学学报,2010,(1).
[2] 葛四友.运气均等主义[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2006.
[3] 〔美〕约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2009.
[4] G·A·Cohen.Rescuing Justice and Equality[M].Harvard:Harvard University Press,2008.
[5] Alan Zatichic.on Deserving to Deserve[J].Philos-ophy & Public Affairs,1977,(4).
[6] PeterJ.Steinberger.Desert and Justicein Rawls[J].The Journal of Politics,1982,44(4).
[7] 〔美〕约翰·罗尔斯.作为公平的正义—正义新论[M].姚大志译.上海:上海三联书店,2002.
[8] 〔美〕约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2010-12-7;改回日期:。
作者简介:张全胜,男,河南项城市人,西安财经学院思政部,讲师,博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01